User Research & Testing

Validate features and user flows before launch to cut dev cycles in half and boost conversions 60%. Ideal for digital products where one wrong feature could cost thousands.

Make Data-Driven Decisions, Not Gut Calls

You’re not your user—and assumptions are expensive.
Too many teams ship features no one uses, redesign flows that still confuse, or chase metrics that never move. Why? Because they’re building based on opinions—not evidence.

Real insights beat guesswork—every time.
Inventive helps you uncover what your users really think, need, and struggle with through targeted user research and usability testing. Whether you’re building from scratch or optimizing an existing product, we replace “we think” with “we know.”

Test early. Learn fast. Build better.
From interviews and surveys to moderated testing and clickstream heatmaps, we gather qualitative and quantitative feedback that reveals what’s working, what’s broken, and what’s missing. You’ll get actionable insight—not just data—with clear design or product recommendations.

From “I guess” to “I’m confident.”
A B2B platform identified a 3-click bottleneck in its onboarding flow that 83% of users failed to complete. After testing and redesign, completion rates jumped by 46%—with zero backend changes. Another client cut support tickets by 35% just by fixing a single misunderstood icon.

Build what users need—not what you hope they need.
Let’s put your product in front of real users and turn feedback into your competitive edge.

Kill two features, save the quarter.

After our first round of testing, we scrapped two features and doubled down on one. It was the best call we made all quarter.

Head of Product Ops, Fintech Scale-Up

Make Data-Driven Decisions, Not Gut Calls

  • Your backlog looks like a wish list with commitment issues.
  • Support tickets sound like user cries for help.
  • You've built cool stuff... that nobody clicks.
85%

of Users UX Issues Found with Just 5 Users

You don't need a crowd––just the right five.

Five usability tests can uncover 85% of UX problems. (User Interviews)

-50%

Dev Time

Fewer false starts, faster finish lines.

Research-led design trims development cycles by 33-50%.

+665%

ROI

yes, six hundred sixty-five.

UserTesting's TEI report shows a 665% return on early research investments.

Make Data-Driven Decisions, Not Gut Calls

Feature Sporadic Surveys Basic A/B Testing Inventive Research Cadence
Insight Quality General opinions, vague signals Behavioral but limited scope Qual + quant, task-based insights
Feature Prioritization HIPPO-driven (“Highest Paid Opinion”) Traffic-based guesses Evidence-backed with user context
Backlog Bloat Grows with guesses Shuffles priorities with no clarity Trimmed with clear desirability signals
Support Load High—users don’t “get it” Medium—some issues caught post-launch Reduced—issues prevented pre-build
Decision Confidence “Hope this works?” “Probably good?” “We heard it straight from users.”